Username / Password :   
LinuxDig.com Request For Comments

RFC Number : 894

Title : Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over Ethernet networks.


Network Working Group Charles Hornig
Request for Comments: 894 Symbolics Cambridge Research Center
April 1984

A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams over Ethernet Networks


Status of this Memo

This RFC specifies a standard method of encapsulating Internet
Protocol (IP) [1] datagrams on an Ethernet [2]. This RFC specifies a
standard protocol for the ARPA-Internet community.

Introduction

This memo applies to the Ethernet (10-megabit/second, 48-bit
addresses). The procedure for transmission of IP datagrams on the
Experimental Ethernet (3-megabit/second, 8-bit addresses) is
described in [3].

Frame Format

IP datagrams are transmitted in standard Ethernet frames. The type
field of the Ethernet frame must contain the value hexadecimal 0800.
The data field contains the IP header followed immediately by the IP
data.

The minimum length of the data field of a packet sent over an
Ethernet is 46 octets. If necessary, the data field should be padded
(with octets of zero) to meet the Ethernet minimum frame size. This
padding is not part of the IP packet and is not included in the total
length field of the IP header.

The minimum length of the data field of a packet sent over an
Ethernet is 1500 octets, thus the maximum length of an IP datagram
sent over an Ethernet is 1500 octets. Implementations are encouraged
to support full-length packets. Gateway implementations MUST be
prepared to accept full-length packets and fragment them if
necessary. If a system cannot receive full-length packets, it should
take steps to discourage others from sending them, such as using the
TCP Maximum Segment Size option [4].

Note: Datagrams on the Ethernet may be longer than the general
Internet default maximum packet size of 576 octets. Hosts connected
to an Ethernet should keep this in mind when sending datagrams to
hosts not on the same Ethernet. It may be appropriate to send
smaller datagrams to avoid unnecessary fragmentation at intermediate
gateways. Please see [4] for further information on this point.





Hornig [Page 1]



RFC 894 April 1984


Address Mappings

The mapping of 32-bit Internet addresses to 48-bit Ethernet addresses
can be done several ways. A static table could be used, or a dynamic
discovery procedure could be used.

Static Table

Each host could be provided with a table of all other hosts on the
local network with both their Ethernet and Internet addresses.

Dynamic Discovery

Mappings between 32-bit Internet addresses and 48-bit Ethernet
addresses could be accomplished through the Address Resolution
Protocol (ARP) [5]. Internet addresses are assigned arbitrarily
on some Internet network. Each host's implementation must know
its own Internet address and respond to Ethernet Address
Resolution packets appropriately. It should also use ARP to
translate Internet addresses to Ethernet addresses when needed.

Broadcast Address

The broadcast Internet address (the address on that network with a
host part of all binary ones) should be mapped to the broadcast
Ethernet address (of all binary ones, FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF hex).

The use of the ARP dynamic discovery procedure is strongly
recommended.

Trailer Formats

Some versions of Unix 4.2bsd use a different encapsulation method in
order to get better network performance with the VAX virtual memory
architecture. Consenting systems on the same Ethernet may use this
format between themselves.

No host is required to implement it, and no datagrams in this format
should be sent to any host unless the sender has positive knowledge
that the recipient will be able to interpret them. Details of the
trailer encapsulation may be found in [6].

(Note: At the present time Unix 4.2bsd will either always use
trailers or never use them (per interface), depending on a boot-time
option. This is expected to be changed in the future. Unix 4.2bsd
also uses a non-standard Internet broadcast address with a host part
of all zeroes, this may also be changed in the future.)



Hornig [Page 2]



RFC 894 April 1984


Byte Order

As described in Appendix B of the Internet Protocol
specification [1], the IP datagram is transmitted over the Ethernet
as a series of 8-bit bytes.

References

[1] Postel, J., 'Internet Protocol', RFC-791, USC/Information
Sciences Institute, September 1981.

[2] 'The Ethernet - A Local Area Network', Version 1.0, Digital
Equipment Corporation, Intel Corporation, Xerox Corporation,
September 1980.

[3] Postel, J., 'A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams
over Experimental Ethernet Networks', RFC-895, USC/Information
Sciences Institute, April 1984.

[4] Postel, J., 'The TCP Maximum Segment Size Option and Related
Topics', RFC-879, USC/Information Sciences Institute, November 1983.

[5] Plummer, D., 'An Ethernet Address Resolution Protocol', RFC-826,
Symbolics Cambridge Research Center, November 1982.

[6] Leffler, S., and M. Karels, 'Trailer Encapsulations', RFC-893,
University of California at Berkeley, April 1984.























Hornig [Page 3]




Site Hosted By Digital Environments, Inc. This Website was Created with DE-Web Version 1.9.7.4,
The Fast, Web Based - Website Design Tool, Groupware and Web Hosting System by Digital Environments, Inc.
Groupware:Project Management, Sales Tracking, Web Site Design and News / Blogger all in one package.