RFC Number : 1002
Title : Protocol standard for a NetBIOS service on a TCP/UDP transport: Detailed specifications.
Network Working Group
Request for Comments: 1002 March, 1987
PROTOCOL STANDARD FOR A NetBIOS SERVICE
ON A TCP/UDP TRANSPORT:
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS
ABSTRACT
This RFC defines a proposed standard protocol to support NetBIOS
services in a TCP/IP environment. Both local network and internet
operation are supported. Various node types are defined to accommodate
local and internet topologies and to allow operation with or without the
use of IP broadcast.
This RFC gives the detailed specifications of the NetBIOS-over-TCP
packets, protocols, and defined constants and variables. A more general
overview is found in a companion RFC, 'Protocol Standard For a NetBIOS
Service on a TCP/UDP Transport: Concepts and Methods'.
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 1]
RFC 1002 March 1987
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. STATUS OF THIS MEMO 4
2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4
3. INTRODUCTION 5
4. PACKET DESCRIPTIONS 5
4.1 NAME FORMAT 5
4.2 NAME SERVICE PACKETS 7
4.2.1 GENERAL FORMAT OF NAME SERVICE PACKETS 7
4.2.1.1 HEADER 8
4.2.1.2 QUESTION SECTION 10
4.2.1.3 RESOURCE RECORD 11
4.2.2 NAME REGISTRATION REQUEST 13
4.2.3 NAME OVERWRITE REQUEST & DEMAND 14
4.2.4 NAME REFRESH REQUEST 15
4.2.5 POSITIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE 16
4.2.6 NEGATIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE 16
4.2.7 END-NODE CHALLENGE REGISTRATION RESPONSE 17
4.2.8 NAME CONFLICT DEMAND 18
4.2.9 NAME RELEASE REQUEST & DEMAND 19
4.2.10 POSITIVE NAME RELEASE RESPONSE 20
4.2.11 NEGATIVE NAME RELEASE RESPONSE 20
4.2.12 NAME QUERY REQUEST 21
4.2.13 POSITIVE NAME QUERY RESPONSE 22
4.2.14 NEGATIVE NAME QUERY RESPONSE 23
4.2.15 REDIRECT NAME QUERY RESPONSE 24
4.2.16 WAIT FOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (WACK) RESPONSE 25
4.2.17 NODE STATUS REQUEST 26
4.2.18 NODE STATUS RESPONSE 27
4.3 SESSION SERVICE PACKETS 29
4.3.1 GENERAL FORMAT OF SESSION PACKETS 29
4.3.2 SESSION REQUEST PACKET 30
4.3.3 POSITIVE SESSION RESPONSE PACKET 31
4.3.4 NEGATIVE SESSION RESPONSE PACKET 31
4.3.5 SESSION RETARGET RESPONSE PACKET 31
4.3.6 SESSION MESSAGE PACKET 32
4.3.7 SESSION KEEP ALIVE PACKET 32
4.4 DATAGRAM SERVICE PACKETS 32
4.4.1 NetBIOS DATAGRAM HEADER 32
4.4.2 DIRECT_UNIQUE, DIRECT_GROUP, & BROADCAST DATAGRAM 33
4.4.3 DATAGRAM ERROR PACKET 34
4.4.4 DATAGRAM QUERY REQUEST 34
4.4.5 DATAGRAM POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE QUERY RESPONSE 34
5. PROTOCOL DESCRIPTIONS 35
5.1 NAME SERVICE PROTOCOLS 35
5.1.1 B-NODE ACTIVITY 35
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 2]
RFC 1002 March 1987
5.1.1.1 B-NODE ADD NAME 35
5.1.1.2 B-NODE ADD_GROUP NAME 37
5.1.1.3 B-NODE FIND_NAME 37
5.1.1.4 B NODE NAME RELEASE 38
5.1.1.5 B-NODE INCOMING PACKET PROCESSING 39
5.1.2 P-NODE ACTIVITY 42
5.1.2.1 P-NODE ADD_NAME 42
5.1.2.2 P-NODE ADD GROUP NAME 45
5.1.2.3 P-NODE FIND NAME 45
5.1.2.4 P-NODE DELETE_NAME 46
5.1.2.5 P-NODE INCOMING PACKET PROCESSING 47
5.1.2.6 P-NODE TIMER INITIATED PROCESSING 49
5.1.3 M-NODE ACTIVITY 50
5.1.3.1 M-NODE ADD NAME 50
5.1.3.2 M-NODE ADD GROUP NAME 54
5.1.3.3 M-NODE FIND NAME 55
5.1.3.4 M-NODE DELETE NAME 56
5.1.3.5 M-NODE INCOMING PACKET PROCESSING 58
5.1.3.6 M-NODE TIMER INITIATED PROCESSING 60
5.1.4 NBNS ACTIVITY 60
5.1.4.1 NBNS INCOMING PACKET PROCESSING 61
5.1.4.2 NBNS TIMER INITIATED PROCESSING 66
5.2 SESSION SERVICE PROTOCOLS 67
5.2.1 SESSION ESTABLISHMENT PROTOCOLS 67
5.2.1.1 USER REQUEST PROCESSING 67
5.2.1.2 RECEIVED PACKET PROCESSING 71
5.2.2 SESSION DATA TRANSFER PROTOCOLS 72
5.2.2.1 USER REQUEST PROCESSING 72
5.2.2.2 RECEIVED PACKET PROCESSING 72
5.2.2.3 PROCESSING INITIATED BY TIMER 73
5.2.3 SESSION TERMINATION PROTOCOLS 73
5.2.3.1 USER REQUEST PROCESSING 73
5.2.3.2 RECEPTION INDICATION PROCESSING 73
5.3 NetBIOS DATAGRAM SERVICE PROTOCOLS 74
5.3.1 B NODE TRANSMISSION OF NetBIOS DATAGRAMS 74
5.3.2 P AND M NODE TRANSMISSION OF NetBIOS DATAGRAMS 76
5.3.3 RECEPTION OF NetBIOS DATAGRAMS BY ALL NODES 78
5.3.4 PROTOCOLS FOR THE NBDD 80
6. DEFINED CONSTANTS AND VARIABLES 83
REFERENCES 85
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 3]
RFC 1002 March 1987
PROTOCOL STANDARD FOR A NetBIOS SERVICE
ON A TCP/UDP TRANSPORT:
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS
1. STATUS OF THIS MEMO
This RFC specifies a proposed standard for the DARPA Internet
community. Since this topic is new to the Internet community,
discussions and suggestions are specifically requested.
Please send written comments to:
Karl Auerbach
Epilogue Technology Corporation
P.O. Box 5432
Redwood City, CA 94063
Please send online comments to:
Avnish Aggarwal
Internet: mtxinu!excelan!avnish@ucbvax.berkeley.edu
Usenet: ucbvax!mtxinu!excelan!avnish
Distribution of this memorandum is unlimited.
2. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This RFC has been developed under the auspices of the Internet
Activities Board.
The following individuals have contributed to the development of
this RFC:
Avnish Aggarwal Arvind Agrawal Lorenzo Aguilar
Geoffrey Arnold Karl Auerbach K. Ramesh Babu
Keith Ball Amatzia Ben-Artzi Vint Cerf
Richard Cherry David Crocker Steve Deering
Greg Ennis Steve Holmgren Jay Israel
David Kaufman Lee LaBarre James Lau
Dan Lynch Gaylord Miyata David Stevens
Steve Thomas Ishan Wu
The system proposed by this RFC does not reflect any existing
Netbios-over-TCP implementation. However, the design
incorporates considerable knowledge obtained from prior
implementations. Special thanks goes to the following
organizations which have provided this invaluable information:
CMC/Syros Excelan Sytek Ungermann-Bass
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 4]
RFC 1002 March 1987
3. INTRODUCTION
This RFC contains the detailed packet formats and protocol
specifications for NetBIOS-over-TCP. This RFC is a companion to
RFC 1001, 'Protocol Standard For a NetBIOS Service on a TCP/UDP
Transport: Concepts and Methods' [1].
4. PACKET DESCRIPTIONS
Bit and byte ordering are defined by the most recent version of
'Assigned Numbers' [2].
4.1. NAME FORMAT
The NetBIOS name representation in all NetBIOS packets (for NAME,
SESSION, and DATAGRAM services) is defined in the Domain Name
Service RFC 883[3] as 'compressed' name messages. This format is
called 'second-level encoding' in the section entitled
'Representation of NetBIOS Names' in the Concepts and Methods
document.
For ease of description, the first two paragraphs from page 31,
the section titled 'Domain name representation and compression',
of RFC 883 are replicated here:
Domain names messages are expressed in terms of a sequence
of labels. Each label is represented as a one octet length
field followed by that number of octets. Since every domain
name ends with the null label of the root, a compressed
domain name is terminated by a length byte of zero. The
high order two bits of the length field must be zero, and
the remaining six bits of the length field limit the label
to 63 octets or less.
To simplify implementations, the total length of label
octets and label length octets that make up a domain name is
restricted to 255 octets or less.
The following is the uncompressed representation of the NetBIOS name
'FRED ', which is the 4 ASCII characters, F, R, E, D, followed by 12
space characters (0x20). This name has the SCOPE_ID: 'NETBIOS.COM'
EGFCEFEECACACACACACACACACACACACA.NETBIOS.COM
This uncompressed representation of names is called 'first-level
encoding' in the section entitled 'Representation of NetBIOS Names'
in the Concepts and Methods document.
The following is a pictographic representation of the compressed
representation of the previous uncompressed Domain Name
representation.
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 5]
RFC 1002 March 1987
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x20 | E (0x45) | G (0x47) | F (0x46) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| C (0x43) | E (0x45) | F (0x46) | E (0x45) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| E (0x45) | C (0x43) | A (0x41) | C (0x43) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| A (0x41) | C (0x43) | A (0x41) | C (0x43) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| A (0x41) | C (0x43) | A (0x41) | C (0x43) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| A (0x41) | C (0x43) | A (0x41) | C (0x43) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| A (0x41) | C (0x43) | A (0x41) | C (0x43) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| A (0x41) | C (0x43) | A (0x41) | C (0x43) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| A (0X41) | 0x07 | N (0x4E) | E (0x45) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| T (0x54) | B (0x42) | I (0x49) | O (0x4F) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| S (0x53) | 0x03 | C (0x43) | O (0x4F) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| M (0x4D) | 0x00 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Each section of a domain name is called a label [7 (page 31)]. A
label can be a maximum of 63 bytes. The first byte of a label in
compressed representation is the number of bytes in the label. For
the above example, the first 0x20 is the number of bytes in the
left-most label, EGFCEFEECACACACACACACACACACACACA, of the domain
name. The bytes following the label length count are the characters
of the label. The following labels are in sequence after the first
label, which is the encoded NetBIOS name, until a zero (0x00) length
count. The zero length count represents the root label, which is
always null.
A label length count is actually a 6-bit field in the label length
field. The most significant 2 bits of the field, bits 7 and 6, are
flags allowing an escape from the above compressed representation.
If bits 7 and 6 are both set (11), the following 14 bits are an
offset pointer into the full message to the actual label string from
another domain name that belongs in this name. This label pointer
allows for a further compression of a domain name in a packet.
NetBIOS implementations can only use label string pointers in Name
Service packets. They cannot be used in Session or Datagram Service
packets.
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 6]
RFC 1002 March 1987
The other two possible values for bits 7 and 6 (01 and 10) of a label
length field are reserved for future use by RFC 883[2 (page 32)].
Note that the first octet of a compressed name must contain one of
the following bit patterns. (An 'x' indicates a bit whose value may
be either 0 or 1.):
00100000 - Netbios name, length must be 32 (decimal)
11xxxxxx - Label string pointer
10xxxxxx - Reserved
01xxxxxx - Reserved
4.2. NAME SERVICE PACKETS
4.2.1. GENERAL FORMAT OF NAME SERVICE PACKETS
The NetBIOS Name Service packets follow the packet structure defined
in the Domain Name Service (DNS) RFC 883 [7 (pg 26-31)]. The
structures are compatible with the existing DNS packet formats,
however, additional types and codes have been added to work with
NetBIOS.
If Name Service packets are sent over a TCP connection they are
preceded by a 16 bit unsigned integer representing the length of the
Name Service packet.
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ ------ ------- +
| HEADER |
+ ------ ------- +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ QUESTION ENTRIES /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ ANSWER RESOURCE RECORDS /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ AUTHORITY RESOURCE RECORDS /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ ADDITIONAL RESOURCE RECORDS /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 7]
RFC 1002 March 1987
4.2.1.1. HEADER
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID | OPCODE | NM_FLAGS | RCODE |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| QDCOUNT | ANCOUNT |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NSCOUNT | ARCOUNT |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Field Description
NAME_TRN_ID Transaction ID for Name Service Transaction.
Requestor places a unique value for each active
transaction. Responder puts NAME_TRN_ID value
from request packet in response packet.
OPCODE Packet type code, see table below.
NM_FLAGS Flags for operation, see table below.
RCODE Result codes of request. Table of RCODE values
for each response packet below.
QDCOUNT Unsigned 16 bit integer specifying the number of
entries in the question section of a Name
Service packet. Always zero (0) for responses.
Must be non-zero for all NetBIOS Name requests.
ANCOUNT Unsigned 16 bit integer specifying the number of
resource records in the answer section of a Name
Service packet.
NSCOUNT Unsigned 16 bit integer specifying the number of
resource records in the authority section of a
Name Service packet.
ARCOUNT Unsigned 16 bit integer specifying the number of
resource records in the additional records
section of a Name Service packet.
The OPCODE field is defined as:
0 1 2 3 4
+---+---+---+---+---+
| R | OPCODE |
+---+---+---+---+---+
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 8]
RFC 1002 March 1987
Symbol Bit(s) Description
OPCODE 1-4 Operation specifier:
0 = query
5 = registration
6 = release
7 = WACK
8 = refresh
R 0 RESPONSE flag:
if bit == 0 then request packet
if bit == 1 then response packet.
The NM_FLAGS field is defined as:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
|AA |TC |RD |RA | 0 | 0 | B |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
Symbol Bit(s) Description
B 6 Broadcast Flag.
= 1: packet was broadcast or multicast
= 0: unicast
RA 3 Recursion Available Flag.
Only valid in responses from a NetBIOS Name
Server -- must be zero in all other
responses.
If one (1) then the NBNS supports recursive
query, registration, and release.
If zero (0) then the end-node must iterate
for query and challenge for registration.
RD 2 Recursion Desired Flag.
May only be set on a request to a NetBIOS
Name Server.
The NBNS will copy its state into the
response packet.
If one (1) the NBNS will iterate on the
query, registration, or release.
TC 1 Truncation Flag.
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 9]
RFC 1002 March 1987
Set if this message was truncated because the
datagram carrying it would be greater than
576 bytes in length. Use TCP to get the
information from the NetBIOS Name Server.
AA 0 Authoritative Answer flag.
Must be zero (0) if R flag of OPCODE is zero
(0).
If R flag is one (1) then if AA is one (1)
then the node responding is an authority for
the domain name.
End nodes responding to queries always set
this bit in responses.
4.2.1.2. QUESTION SECTION
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ QUESTION_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| QUESTION_TYPE | QUESTION_CLASS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Field Description
QUESTION_NAME The compressed name representation of the
NetBIOS name for the request.
QUESTION_TYPE The type of request. The values for this field
are specified for each request.
QUESTION_CLASS The class of the request. The values for this
field are specified for each request.
QUESTION_TYPE is defined as:
Symbol Value Description:
NB 0x0020 NetBIOS general Name Service Resource Record
NBSTAT 0x0021 NetBIOS NODE STATUS Resource Record (See NODE
STATUS REQUEST)
QUESTION_CLASS is defined as:
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 10]
RFC 1002 March 1987
Symbol Value Description:
IN 0x0001 Internet class
4.2.1.3. RESOURCE RECORD
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| RR_TYPE | RR_CLASS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TTL |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| RDLENGTH | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
/ /
/ RDATA /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Field Description
RR_NAME The compressed name representation of the
NetBIOS name corresponding to this resource
record.
RR_TYPE Resource record type code
RR_CLASS Resource record class code
TTL The Time To Live of a the resource record's
name.
RDLENGTH Unsigned 16 bit integer that specifies the
number of bytes in the RDATA field.
RDATA RR_CLASS and RR_TYPE dependent field. Contains
the resource information for the NetBIOS name.
RESOURCE RECORD RR_TYPE field definitions:
Symbol Value Description:
A 0x0001 IP address Resource Record (See REDIRECT NAME
QUERY RESPONSE)
NS 0x0002 Name Server Resource Record (See REDIRECT
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 11]
RFC 1002 March 1987
NAME QUERY RESPONSE)
NULL 0x000A NULL Resource Record (See WAIT FOR
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RESPONSE)
NB 0x0020 NetBIOS general Name Service Resource Record
(See NB_FLAGS and NB_ADDRESS, below)
NBSTAT 0x0021 NetBIOS NODE STATUS Resource Record (See NODE
STATUS RESPONSE)
RESOURCE RECORD RR_CLASS field definitions:
Symbol Value Description:
IN 0x0001 Internet class
NB_FLAGS field of the RESOURCE RECORD RDATA field for RR_TYPE of
'NB':
1 1 1 1 1 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| G | ONT | RESERVED |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
Symbol Bit(s) Description:
RESERVED 3-15 Reserved for future use. Must be zero (0).
ONT 1,2 Owner Node Type:
00 = B node
01 = P node
10 = M node
11 = Reserved for future use
For registration requests this is the
claimant's type.
For responses this is the actual owner's
type.
G 0 Group Name Flag.
If one (1) then the RR_NAME is a GROUP
NetBIOS name.
If zero (0) then the RR_NAME is a UNIQUE
NetBIOS name.
The NB_ADDRESS field of the RESOURCE RECORD RDATA field for
RR_TYPE of 'NB' is the IP address of the name's owner.
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 12]
RFC 1002 March 1987
4.2.2. NAME REGISTRATION REQUEST
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |0| 0x5 |0|0|1|0|0 0|B| 0x0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0001 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0001 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ QUESTION_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TTL |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0006 | NB_FLAGS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB_ADDRESS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Since the RR_NAME is the same name as the QUESTION_NAME, the
RR_NAME representation must use pointers to the QUESTION_NAME
name's labels to guarantee the length of the datagram is less
than the maximum 576 bytes. See section above on name formats
and also page 31 and 32 of RFC 883, Domain Names - Implementation
and Specification, for a complete description of compressed name
label pointers.
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 13]
RFC 1002 March 1987
4.2.3. NAME OVERWRITE REQUEST & DEMAND
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |0| 0x5 |0|0|0|0|0 0|B| 0x0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0001 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0001 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ QUESTION_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TTL |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0006 | NB_FLAGS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB_ADDRESS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 14]
RFC 1002 March 1987
4.2.4. NAME REFRESH REQUEST
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |0| 0x9 |0|0|0|0|0 0|B| 0x0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0001 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0001 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ QUESTION_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TTL |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0006 | NB_FLAGS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB_ADDRESS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 15]
RFC 1002 March 1987
4.2.5. POSITIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |1| 0x5 |1|0|1|1|0 0|0| 0x0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0001 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TTL |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0006 | NB_FLAGS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB_ADDRESS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
4.2.6. NEGATIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |1| 0x5 |1|0|1|1|0 0|0| RCODE |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0001 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TTL |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0006 | NB_FLAGS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB_ADDRESS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 16]
RFC 1002 March 1987
RCODE field values:
Symbol Value Description:
FMT_ERR 0x1 Format Error. Request was invalidly
formatted.
SRV_ERR 0x2 Server failure. Problem with NBNS, cannot
process name.
IMP_ERR 0x4 Unsupported request error. Allowable only
for challenging NBNS when gets an Update type
registration request.
RFS_ERR 0x5 Refused error. For policy reasons server
will not register this name from this host.
ACT_ERR 0x6 Active error. Name is owned by another node.
CFT_ERR 0x7 Name in conflict error. A UNIQUE name is
owned by more than one node.
4.2.7. END-NODE CHALLENGE REGISTRATION RESPONSE
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |1| 0x5 |1|0|1|0|0 0|0| 0x0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0001 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TTL |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0006 | NB_FLAGS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB_ADDRESS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 17]
RFC 1002 March 1987
4.2.8. NAME CONFLICT DEMAND
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |1| 0x5 |1|0|1|1|0 0|0| 0x7 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0001 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x00000000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0006 |0|ONT|0| 0x000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x00000000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
This packet is identical to a NEGATIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE
with RCODE = CFT_ERR.
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 18]
RFC 1002 March 1987
4.2.9. NAME RELEASE REQUEST & DEMAND
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |0| 0x6 |0|0|0|0|0 0|B| 0x0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0001 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0001 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ QUESTION_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x00000000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0006 | NB_FLAGS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB_ADDRESS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Since the RR_NAME is the same name as the QUESTION_NAME, the
RR_NAME representation must use label string pointers to the
QUESTION_NAME labels to guarantee the length of the datagram is
less than the maximum 576 bytes. This is the same condition as
with the NAME REGISTRATION REQUEST.
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 19]
RFC 1002 March 1987
4.2.10. POSITIVE NAME RELEASE RESPONSE
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |1| 0x6 |1|0|0|0|0 0|0| 0x0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0001 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TTL |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0006 | NB_FLAGS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB_ADDRESS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
4.2.11. NEGATIVE NAME RELEASE RESPONSE
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |1| 0x6 |1|0|0|0|0 0|0| RCODE |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0001 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TTL |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0006 | NB_FLAGS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB_ADDRESS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 20]
RFC 1002 March 1987
RCODE field values:
Symbol Value Description:
FMT_ERR 0x1 Format Error. Request was invalidly
formatted.
SRV_ERR 0x2 Server failure. Problem with NBNS, cannot
process name.
RFS_ERR 0x5 Refused error. For policy reasons server
will not release this name from this host.
ACT_ERR 0x6 Active error. Name is owned by another node.
Only that node may release it. A NetBIOS
Name Server can optionally allow a node to
release a name it does not own. This would
facilitate detection of inactive names for
nodes that went down silently.
4.2.12. NAME QUERY REQUEST
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |0| 0x0 |0|0|1|0|0 0|B| 0x0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0001 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ QUESTION_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 21]
RFC 1002 March 1987
4.2.13. POSITIVE NAME QUERY RESPONSE
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |1| 0x0 |1|T|1|?|0 0|0| 0x0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0001 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TTL |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| RDLENGTH | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| |
/ ADDR_ENTRY ARRAY /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The ADDR_ENTRY ARRAY a sequence of zero or more ADDR_ENTRY
records. Each ADDR_ENTRY record represents an owner of a name.
For group names there may be multiple entries. However, the list
may be incomplete due to packet size limitations. Bit 22, 'T',
will be set to indicate truncated data.
Each ADDR_ENTRY has the following format:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB_FLAGS | NB_ADDRESS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NB_ADDRESS (continued) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 22]
RFC 1002 March 1987
4.2.14. NEGATIVE NAME QUERY RESPONSE
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |1| 0x0 |1|0|1|?|0 0|0| RCODE |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NULL (0x000A) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x00000000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
RCODE field values:
Symbol Value Description
FMT_ERR 0x1 Format Error. Request was invalidly
formatted.
SRV_ERR 0x2 Server failure. Problem with NBNS, cannot
process name.
NAM_ERR 0x3 Name Error. The name requested does not
exist.
IMP_ERR 0x4 Unsupported request error. Allowable only
for challenging NBNS when gets an Update type
registration request.
RFS_ERR 0x5 Refused error. For policy reasons server
will not register this name from this host.
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 23]
RFC 1002 March 1987
4.2.15. REDIRECT NAME QUERY RESPONSE
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |1| 0x0 |0|0|1|0|0 0|0| 0x0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0001 | 0x0001 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NS (0x0002) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TTL |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| RDLENGTH | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +
| |
/ NSD_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| A (0x0001) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TTL |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0004 | NSD_IP_ADDR |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NSD_IP_ADDR, continued |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
An end node responding to a NAME QUERY REQUEST always responds
with the AA and RA bits set for both the NEGATIVE and POSITIVE
NAME QUERY RESPONSE packets. An end node never sends a REDIRECT
NAME QUERY RESPONSE packet.
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 24]
RFC 1002 March 1987
When the requestor receives the REDIRECT NAME QUERY RESPONSE it
must reiterate the NAME QUERY REQUEST to the NBNS specified by
the NSD_IP_ADDR field of the A type RESOURCE RECORD in the
ADDITIONAL section of the response packet. This is an optional
packet for the NBNS.
The NSD_NAME and the RR_NAME in the ADDITIONAL section of the
response packet are the same name. Space can be optimized if
label string pointers are used in the RR_NAME which point to the
labels in the NSD_NAME.
The RR_NAME in the AUTHORITY section is the name of the domain
the NBNS called by NSD_NAME has authority over.
4.2.16. WAIT FOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (WACK) RESPONSE
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |1| 0x7 |1|0|0|0|0 0|0| 0x0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0001 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NULL (0x0020) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TTL |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0002 | OPCODE | NM_FLAGS | 0x0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 25]
RFC 1002 March 1987
The NAME_TRN_ID of the WACK RESPONSE packet is the same
NAME_TRN_ID of the request that the NBNS is telling the requestor
to wait longer to complete. The RR_NAME is the name from the
request, if any. If no name is available from the request then
it is a null name, single byte of zero.
The TTL field of the ResourceRecord is the new time to wait, in
seconds, for the request to complete. The RDATA field contains
the OPCODE and NM_FLAGS of the request.
A TTL value of 0 means that the NBNS can not estimate the time it
may take to complete a response.
4.2.17. NODE STATUS REQUEST
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |0| 0x0 |0|0|0|0|0 0|B| 0x0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0001 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ QUESTION_NAME /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NBSTAT (0x0021) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 26]
RFC 1002 March 1987
4.2.18. NODE STATUS RESPONSE
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_TRN_ID |1| 0x0 |1|0|0|0|0 0|0| 0x0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0001 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x0000 | 0x0000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ RR_NAME /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NBSTAT (0x0021) | IN (0x0001) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0x00000000 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| RDLENGTH | NUM_NAMES | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +
| |
+ +
/ NODE_NAME ARRAY /
+ +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ +
/ STATISTICS /
+ +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The NODE_NAME ARRAY is an array of zero or more NUM_NAMES entries
of NODE_NAME records. Each NODE_NAME entry represents an active
name in the same NetBIOS scope as the requesting name in the
local name table of the responder. RR_NAME is the requesting
name.
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 27]
RFC 1002 March 1987
NODE_NAME Entry:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+--- ---+
| |
+--- NETBIOS FORMAT NAME ---+
| |
+--- ---+
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NAME_FLAGS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The NAME_FLAGS field:
1 1 1 1 1 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| G | ONT |DRG|CNF|ACT|PRM| RESERVED |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
The NAME_FLAGS field is defined as:
Symbol Bit(s) Description:
RESERVED 7-15 Reserved for future use. Must be zero (0).
PRM 6 Permanent Name Flag. If one (1) then entry
is for the permanent node name. Flag is zero
(0) for all other names.
ACT 5 Active Name Flag. All entries have this flag
set to one (1).
CNF 4 Conflict Flag. If one (1) then name on this
node is in conflict.
DRG 3 Deregister Flag. If one (1) then this name
is in the process of being deleted.
ONT 1,2 Owner Node Type:
00 = B node
01 = P node
10 = M node
11 = Reserved for future use
G 0 Group Name Flag.
If one (1) then the name is a GROUP NetBIOS
name.
If zero (0) then it is a UNIQUE NetBIOS name.
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 28]
RFC 1002 March 1987
STATISTICS Field of the NODE STATUS RESPONSE:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| UNIT_ID (Unique unit ID) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| UNIT_ID,continued | JUMPERS | TEST_RESULT |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| VERSION_NUMBER | PERIOD_OF_STATISTICS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NUMBER_OF_CRCs | NUMBER_ALIGNMENT_ERRORS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NUMBER_OF_COLLISIONS | NUMBER_SEND_ABORTS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NUMBER_GOOD_SENDS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NUMBER_GOOD_RECEIVES |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NUMBER_RETRANSMITS | NUMBER_NO_RESOURCE_CONDITIONS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| NUMBER_FREE_COMMAND_BLOCKS | TOTAL_NUMBER_COMMAND_BLOCKS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|MAX_TOTAL_NUMBER_COMMAND_BLOCKS| NUMBER_PENDING_SESSIONS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| MAX_NUMBER_PENDING_SESSIONS | MAX_TOTAL_SESSIONS_POSSIBLE |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SESSION_DATA_PACKET_SIZE |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
4.3. SESSION SERVICE PACKETS
4.3.1. GENERAL FORMAT OF SESSION PACKETS
All session service messages are sent over a TCP connection.
All session packets are of the following general structure:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TYPE | FLAGS | LENGTH |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ TRAILER (Packet Type Dependent) /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The TYPE, FLAGS, and LENGTH fields are present in every session
packet.
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 29]
RFC 1002 March 1987
The LENGTH field is the number of bytes following the LENGTH
field. In other words, LENGTH is the combined size of the
TRAILER field(s). For example, the POSITIVE SESSION RESPONSE
packet always has a LENGTH field value of zero (0000) while the
RETARGET SESSION RESPONSE always has a LENGTH field value of six
(0006).
One of the bits of the FLAGS field acts as an additional, high-
order bit for the LENGTH field. Thus the cumulative size of the
trailer field(s) may range from 0 to 128K bytes.
Session Packet Types (in hexidecimal):
00 - SESSION MESSAGE
81 - SESSION REQUEST
82 - POSITIVE SESSION RESPONSE
83 - NEGATIVE SESSION RESPONSE
84 - RETARGET SESSION RESPONSE
85 - SESSION KEEP ALIVE
Bit definitions of the FLAGS field:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | E |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
Symbol Bit(s) Description
E 7 Length extension, used as an additional,
high-order bit on the LENGTH field.
RESERVED 0-6 Reserved, must be zero (0)
4.3.2. SESSION REQUEST PACKET
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TYPE | FLAGS | LENGTH |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ CALLED NAME /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ CALLING NAME /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 30]
RFC 1002 March 1987
4.3.3. POSITIVE SESSION RESPONSE PACKET
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TYPE | FLAGS | LENGTH |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
4.3.4. NEGATIVE SESSION RESPONSE PACKET
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TYPE | FLAGS | LENGTH |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ERROR_CODE |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NEGATIVE SESSION RESPONSE packet error code values (in
hexidecimal):
80 - Not listening on called name
81 - Not listening for calling name
82 - Called name not present
83 - Called name present, but insufficient resources
8F - Unspecified error
4.3.5. SESSION RETARGET RESPONSE PACKET
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TYPE | FLAGS | LENGTH |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| RETARGET_IP_ADDRESS |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| PORT |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 31]
RFC 1002 March 1987
4.3.6. SESSION MESSAGE PACKET
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TYPE | FLAGS | LENGTH |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ /
/ USER_DATA /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
4.3.7. SESSION KEEP ALIVE PACKET
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| TYPE | FLAGS | LENGTH |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
4.4. DATAGRAM SERVICE PACKETS
4.4.1. NetBIOS DATAGRAM HEADER
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| MSG_TYPE | FLAGS | DGM_ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SOURCE_IP |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SOURCE_PORT | DGM_LENGTH |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| PACKET_OFFSET |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
MSG_TYPE values (in hexidecimal):
10 - DIRECT_UNIQUE DATAGRAM
11 - DIRECT_GROUP DATAGRAM
12 - BROADCAST DATAGRAM
13 - DATAGRAM ERROR
14 - DATAGRAM QUERY REQUEST
15 - DATAGRAM POSITIVE QUERY RESPONSE
16 - DATAGRAM NEGATIVE QUERY RESPONSE
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 32]
RFC 1002 March 1987
Bit definitions of the FLAGS field:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | SNT | F | M |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
Symbol Bit(s) Description
M 7 MORE flag, If set then more NetBIOS datagram
fragments follow.
F 6 FIRST packet flag, If set then this is first
(and possibly only) fragment of NetBIOS
datagram
SNT 4,5 Source End-Node type:
00 = B node
01 = P node
10 = M node
11 = NBDD
RESERVED 0-3 Reserved, must be zero (0)
4.4.2. DIRECT_UNIQUE, DIRECT_GROUP, & BROADCAST DATAGRAM
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| MSG_TYPE | FLAGS | DGM_ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SOURCE_IP |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SOURCE_PORT | DGM_LENGTH |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| PACKET_OFFSET | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| |
/ SOURCE_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ DESTINATION_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
/ USER_DATA /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 33]
RFC 1002 March 1987
4.4.3. DATAGRAM ERROR PACKET
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| MSG_TYPE | FLAGS | DGM_ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SOURCE_IP |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SOURCE_PORT | ERROR_CODE |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
ERROR_CODE values (in hexidecimal):
82 - DESTINATION NAME NOT PRESENT
83 - INVALID SOURCE NAME FORMAT
84 - INVALID DESTINATION NAME FORMAT
4.4.4. DATAGRAM QUERY REQUEST
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| MSG_TYPE | FLAGS | DGM_ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SOURCE_IP |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SOURCE_PORT | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +
| |
/ DESTINATION_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
4.4.5. DATAGRAM POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE QUERY RESPONSE
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| MSG_TYPE | FLAGS | DGM_ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SOURCE_IP |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SOURCE_PORT | |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +
| |
/ DESTINATION_NAME /
/ /
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 34]
RFC 1002 March 1987
5. PROTOCOL DESCRIPTIONS
5.1. NAME SERVICE PROTOCOLS
A REQUEST packet is always sent to the well known UDP port -
NAME_SERVICE_UDP_PORT. The destination address is normally
either the IP broadcast address or the address of the NBNS - the
address of the NBNS server it set up at initialization time. In
rare cases, a request packet will be sent to an end node, e.g. a
NAME QUERY REQUEST sent to 'challenge' a node.
A RESPONSE packet is always sent to the source UDP port and
source IP address of the request packet.
A DEMAND packet must always be sent to the well known UDP port -
NAME_SERVICE_UDP_PORT. There is no restriction on the target IP
address.
Terms used in this section:
tid - Transaction ID. This is a value composed from
the requestor's IP address and a unique 16 bit
value generated by the originator of the
transaction.
5.1.1. B-NODE ACTIVITY
5.1.1.1. B-NODE ADD NAME
PROCEDURE add_name(newname)
/*
* Host initiated processing for a B node
*/
BEGIN
REPEAT
/* build name service packet */
ONT = B_NODE; /* broadcast node */
G = UNIQUE; /* unique name */
TTL = 0;
broadcast NAME REGISTRATION REQUEST packet;
/*
* remote node(s) will send response packet
* if applicable
*/
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 35]
RFC 1002 March 1987
pause(BCAST_REQ_RETRY_TIMEOUT);
UNTIL response packet is received or
retransmit count has been exceeded
IF no response packet was received THEN
BEGIN /* no response */
/*
* build packet
*/
ONT = B_NODE; /* broadcast node */
G = UNIQUE; /* unique name */
TTL = 0;
/*
* Let other nodes known you have the name
*/
broadcast NAME UPDATE REQUEST packet;
/* name can be added to local name table */
return success;
END /* no response */
ELSE
BEGIN /* got response */
/*
* Match return transaction id
* against tid sent in request
*/
IF NOT response tid = request tid THEN
BEGIN
ignore response packet;
END
ELSE
CASE packet type OF
NEGATIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE:
return failure; /* name cannot be added */
POSITIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE:
END-NODE CHALLENGE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE:
/*
* B nodes should normally not get this
* response.
*/
ignore packet;
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 36]
RFC 1002 March 1987
END /* case */;
END /* got response */
END /* procedure */
5.1.1.2. B-NODE ADD_GROUP NAME
PROCEDURE add_group_name(newname)
/*
* Host initiated processing for a B node
*/
BEGIN
/*
* same as for a unique name with the
* exception that the group bit (G) must
* be set in the request packets.
*/
...
G = GROUP;
...
...
/*
* broadcast request ...
*/
END
5.1.1.3. B-NODE FIND_NAME
PROCEDURE find_name(name)
/*
* Host initiated processing for a B node
*/
BEGIN
REPEAT
/*
* build packet
*/
ONT = B;
TTL = 0;
G = DONT CARE;
broadcast NAME QUERY REQUEST packet;
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 37]
RFC 1002 March 1987
/*
* a node might send response packet
*/
pause(BCAST_REQ_RETRY_TIMEOUT);
UNTIL response packet received OR
max transmit threshold exceeded
IF no response packet received THEN
return failure;
ELSE
IF NOT response tid = request tid THEN
ignore packet;
ELSE
CASE packet type OF
POSITIVE NAME QUERY RESPONSE:
/*
* Start a timer to detect conflict.
*
* Be prepared to detect conflict if
* any more response packets are received.
*
*/
save response as authoritative response;
start_timer(CONFLICT_TIMER);
return success;
NEGATIVE NAME QUERY RESPONSE:
REDIRECT NAME QUERY RESPONSE:
/*
* B Node should normally not get either
* response.
*/
ignore response packet;
END /* case */
END /* procedure */
5.1.1.4. B NODE NAME RELEASE
PROCEDURE delete_name (name)
BEGIN
REPEAT
/*
* build packet
*/
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 38]
RFC 1002 March 1987
...
/*
* send request
*/
broadcast NAME RELEASE REQUEST packet;
/*
* no response packet expected
*/
pause(BCAST_REQ_RETRY_TIMEOUT);
UNTIL retransmit count has been exceeded
END /* procedure */
5.1.1.5. B-NODE INCOMING PACKET PROCESSING
Following processing is done when broadcast or unicast packets
are received at the NAME_SERVICE_UDP_PORT.
PROCEDURE process_incoming_packet(packet)
/*
* Processing initiated by incoming packets for a B node
*/
BEGIN
/*
* Note: response packets are always sent
* to:
* source IP address of request packet
* source UDP port of request packet
*/
CASE packet type OF
NAME REGISTRATION REQUEST (UNIQUE):
IF name exists in local name table THEN
send NEGATIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE ;
NAME REGISTRATION REQUEST (GROUP):
IF name exists in local name table THEN
BEGIN
IF local entry is a unique name THEN
send NEGATIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE ;
END
NAME QUERY REQUEST:
IF name exists in local name table THEN
BEGIN
build response packet;
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 39]
RFC 1002 March 1987
send POSITIVE NAME QUERY RESPONSE;
POSITIVE NAME QUERY RESPONSE:
IF name conflict timer is not active THEN
BEGIN
/*
* timer has expired already... ignore this
* packet
*/
return;
END
ELSE /* timer is active */
IF a response for this name has previously been
received THEN
BEGIN /* existing entry */
/*
* we sent out a request packet, and
* have already received (at least)
* one response
*
* Check if conflict exists.
* If so, send out a conflict packet.
*
* Note: detecting conflict does NOT
* affect any existing sessions.
*
*/
/*
* Check for name conflict.
* See 'Name Conflict' in Concepts and Methods
*/
check saved authoritative response against
information in this response packet;
IF conflict detected THEN
BEGIN
unicast NAME CONFLICT DEMAND packet;
IF entry exists in cache THEN
BEGIN
remove entry from cache;
END
END
END /* existing entry */
ELSE
BEGIN
/*
* Note: If this was the first response
* to a name query, it would have been
* handled in the
* find_name() procedure.
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 40]
RFC 1002 March 1987
*/
ignore packet;
END
NAME CONFLICT DEMAND:
IF name exists in local name table THEN
BEGIN
mark name as conflict detected;
/*
* a name in the state 'conflict detected'
* does not 'logically' exist on that node.
* No further session will be accepted on
* that name.
* No datagrams can be sent against that name.
* Such an entry will not be used for
* purposes of processing incoming request
* packets.
* The only valid user NetBIOS operation
* against such a name is DELETE NAME.
*/
END
NAME RELEASE REQUEST:
IF caching is being done THEN
BEGIN
remove entry from cache;
END
NAME UPDATE REQUEST:
IF caching is being done THEN
BEGIN
IF entry exists in cache already,
update cache;
ELSE IF name is 'interesting' THEN
BEGIN
add entry to cache;
END
END
NODE STATUS REQUEST:
IF name exists in local name table THEN
BEGIN
/*
* send only those names that are
* in the same scope as the scope
* field in the request packet
*/
send NODE STATUS RESPONSE;
END
END
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 41]
RFC 1002 March 1987
5.1.2. P-NODE ACTIVITY
All packets sent or received by P nodes are unicast UDP packets.
A P node sends name service requests to the NBNS node that is
specified in the P-node configuration.
5.1.2.1. P-NODE ADD_NAME
PROCEDURE add_name(newname)
/*
* Host initiated processing for a P node
*/
BEGIN
REPEAT
/*
* build packet
*/
ONT = P;
G = UNIQUE;
...
/*
* send request
*/
unicast NAME REGISTRATION REQUEST packet;
/*
* NBNS will send response packet
*/
IF receive a WACK RESPONSE THEN
pause(time from TTL field of response);
ELSE
pause(UCAST_REQ_RETRY_TIMEOUT);
UNTIL response packet is received OR
retransmit count has been exceeded
IF no response packet was received THEN
BEGIN /* no response */
/*
* NBNS is down. Cannot claim name.
*/
return failure; /* name cannot be claimed */
END /* no response */
ELSE
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 42]
RFC 1002 March 1987
BEGIN /* response */
IF NOT response tid = request tid THEN
BEGIN
/* Packet may belong to another transaction */
ignore response packet;
END
ELSE
CASE packet type OF
POSITIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE:
/*
* name can be added
*/
adjust refresh timeout value, TTL, for this name;
return success; /* name can be added */
NEGATIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE:
return failure; /* name cannot be added */
END-NODE CHALLENGE REGISTRATION REQUEST:
BEGIN /* end node challenge */
/*
* The response packet has in it the
* address of the presumed owner of the
* name. Challenge that owner.
* If owner either does not
* respond or indicates that he no longer
* owns the name, claim the name.
* Otherwise, the name cannot be claimed.
*
*/
REPEAT
/*
* build packet
*/
...
unicast NAME QUERY REQUEST packet to the
address contained in the END NODE
CHALLENGE RESPONSE packet;
/*
* remote node may send response packet
*/
pause(UCAST_REQ_RETRY_TIMEOUT);
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 43]
RFC 1002 March 1987
UNTIL response packet is received or
retransmit count has been exceeded
IF no response packet is received OR
NEGATIVE NAME QUERY RESPONSE packet
received THEN
BEGIN /* update */
/*
* name can be claimed
*/
REPEAT
/*
* build packet
*/
...
unicast NAME UPDATE REQUEST to NBNS;
/*
* NBNS node will send response packet
*/
IF receive a WACK RESPONSE THEN
pause(time from TTL field of response);
ELSE
pause(UCAST_REQ_RETRY_TIMEOUT);
UNTIL response packet is received or
retransmit count has been exceeded
IF no response packet received THEN
BEGIN /* no response */
/*
* name could not be claimed
*/
return failure;
END /* no response */
ELSE
CASE packet type OF
POSITIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE:
/*
* add name
*/
return success;
NEGATIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE:
/*
* you lose ...
*/
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 44]
RFC 1002 March 1987
return failure;
END /* case */
END /* update */
ELSE
/*
* received a positive response to the 'challenge'
* Remote node still has name
*/
return failure;
END /* end node challenge */
END /* response */
END /* procedure */
5.1.2.2. P-NODE ADD GROUP NAME
PROCEDURE add_group_name(newname)
/*
* Host initiated processing for a P node
*/
BEGIN
/*
* same as for a unique name, except that the
* request packet must indicate that a
* group name claim is being made.
*/
...
G = GROUP;
...
/*
* send packet
*/
...
END
5.1.2.3. P-NODE FIND NAME
PROCEDURE find_name(name)
/*
* Host initiated processing for a P node
*/
BEGIN
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 45]
RFC 1002 March 1987
REPEAT
/*
* build packet
*/
ONT = P;
G = DONT CARE;
unicast NAME QUERY REQUEST packet;
/*
* a NBNS node might send response packet
*/
IF receive a WACK RESPONSE THEN
pause(time from TTL field of response);
ELSE
pause(UCAST_REQ_RETRY_TIMEOUT);
UNTIL response packet received OR
max transmit threshold exceeded
IF no response packet received THEN
return failure;
ELSE
IF NOT response tid = request tid THEN
ignore packet;
ELSE
CASE packet type OF
POSITIVE NAME QUERY RESPONSE:
return success;
REDIRECT NAME QUERY RESPONSE:
/*
* NBNS node wants this end node
* to use some other NBNS node
* to resolve the query.
*/
repeat query with NBNS address
in the response packet;
NEGATIVE NAME QUERY RESPONSE:
return failure;
END /* case */
END /* procedure */
5.1.2.4. P-NODE DELETE_NAME
PROCEDURE delete_name (name)
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 46]
RFC 1002 March 1987
/*
* Host initiated processing for a P node
*/
BEGIN
REPEAT
/*
* build packet
*/
...
/*
* send request
*/
unicast NAME RELEASE REQUEST packet;
IF receive a WACK RESPONSE THEN
pause(time from TTL field of response);
ELSE
pause(UCAST_REQ_RETRY_TIMEOUT);
UNTIL retransmit count has been exceeded
or response been received
IF response has been received THEN
CASE packet type OF
POSITIVE NAME RELEASE RESPONSE:
return success;
NEGATIVE NAME RELEASE RESPONSE:
/*
* NBNS does want node to delete this
* name !!!
*/
return failure;
END /* case */
END /* procedure */
5.1.2.5. P-NODE INCOMING PACKET PROCESSING
Processing initiated by reception of packets at a P node
PROCEDURE process_incoming_packet(packet)
/*
* Processing initiated by incoming packets at a P node
*/
BEGIN
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 47]
RFC 1002 March 1987
/*
* always ignore UDP broadcast packets
*/
IF packet was sent as a broadcast THEN
BEGIN
ignore packet;
return;
END
CASE packet type of
NAME CONFLICT DEMAND:
IF name exists in local name table THEN
mark name as in conflict;
return;
NAME QUERY REQUEST:
IF name exists in local name table THEN
BEGIN /* name exists */
/*
* build packet
*/
...
/*
* send response to the IP address and port
* number from which the request was received.
*/
send POSITIVE NAME QUERY RESPONSE ;
return;
END /* exists */
ELSE
BEGIN /* does not exist */
/*
* send response to the requestor
*/
send NEGATIVE NAME QUERY RESPONSE ;
return;
END /* does not exist */
NODE STATUS REQUEST:
/*
* Name of '*' may be used for force node to
* divulge status for administrative purposes
*/
IF name in local name table OR name = '*' THEN
BEGIN
/*
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 48]
RFC 1002 March 1987
* Build response packet and
* send to requestor node
* Send only those names that are
* in the same scope as the scope
* in the request packet.
*/
send NODE STATUS RESPONSE;
END
NAME RELEASE REQUEST:
/*
* This will be received if the NBNS wants to flush the
* name from the local name table, or from the local
* cache.
*/
IF name exists in the local name table THEN
BEGIN
delete name from local name table;
inform user that name has been deleted;
END
ELSE
IF name has been cached locally THEN
BEGIN
remove entry from cache:
END
END /* case */
END /* procedure */
5.1.2.6. P-NODE TIMER INITIATED PROCESSING
Processing initiated by timer expiration.
PROCEDURE timer_expired()
/*
* Processing initiated by the expiration of a timer on a P node
*/
BEGIN
/*
* Send a NAME REFRESH REQUEST for each name which the
* TTL which has expired.
*/
REPEAT
build NAME REFRESH REQUEST packet;
REPEAT
send packet to NBNS;
IF receive a WACK RESPONSE THEN
pause(time from TTL field of response);
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 49]
RFC 1002 March 1987
ELSE
pause(UCAST_REQ_RETRY_TIMEOUT);
UNTIL response packet is received or
retransmit count has been exceeded
CASE packet type OF
POSITIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE:
/* successfully refreshed */
reset TTL timer for this name;
NEGATIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE:
/*
* refused, can't keep name
* assume in conflict
*/
mark name as in conflict;
END /* case */
UNTIL request sent for all names for which TTL
has expired
END /* procedure */
5.1.3. M-NODE ACTIVITY
M nodes behavior is similar to that of P nodes with the addition
of some B node-like broadcast actions. M node name service
proceeds in two steps:
1.Use broadcast UDP based name service. Depending on the
operation, goto step 2.
2.Use directed UDP name service.
The following code for M nodes is exactly the same as for a P
node, with the exception that broadcast operations are done
before P type operation is attempted.
5.1.3.1. M-NODE ADD NAME
PROCEDURE add_name(newname)
/*
* Host initiated processing for a M node
*/
BEGIN
/*
* check if name exists on the
* broadcast area
*/
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 50]
RFC 1002 March 1987
REPEAT
/* build packet */
....
broadcast NAME REGISTRATION REQUEST packet;
pause(BCAST_REQ_RETRY_TIMEOUT);
UNTIL response packet is received or
retransmit count has been exceeded
IF valid response received THEN
BEGIN
/* cannot claim name */
return failure;
END
/*
* No objections received within the
* broadcast area.
* Send request to name server.
*/
REPEAT
/*
* build packet
*/
ONT = M;
...
unicast NAME REGISTRATION REQUEST packet;
/*
* remote NBNS will send response packet
*/
IF receive a WACK RESPONSE THEN
pause(time from TTL field of response);
ELSE
pause(UCAST_REQ_RETRY_TIMEOUT);
UNTIL response packet is received or
retransmit count has been exceeded
IF no response packet was received THEN
BEGIN /* no response */
/*
* NBNS is down. Cannot claim name.
*/
NetBIOS Working Group [Page 51]
RFC 1002 March 1987
return failure; /* name cannot be claimed */
END /* no response */
ELSE
BEGIN /* response */
IF NOT response tid = request tid THEN
BEGIN
ignore response packet;
END
ELSE
CASE packet type OF
POSITIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE:
/*
* name can be added
*/
adjust refresh timeout value, TTL;
return success; /* name can be added */
NEGATIVE NAME REGISTRATION RESPONSE:
return failure; /* name cannot be added */
END-NODE CHALLENGE REGISTRATION REQUEST:
BEGIN /* end node challenge */
/*
* The response packet has in it the
* address of the presumed owner of the
* name. Challenge that owner.
* If owner either does not
* respond or indicates that he no longer
* owns the name, claim the name.
* Otherwise, the name cannot be claimed.
*
*/
REPEAT
/*
* build packet
*/
...
|
